Goal clarity — named the real learning/safety goal, not just the task
1234
Limitation awareness — named a specific way the AI output could be wrong
1234
Evidence verification — sought independent evidence, not repetition
1234
Privacy and stakeholder recognition — named people affected beyond themselves
1234
Tolerance for uncertainty — did not force a false sense of certainty
1234
Responsible final decision — chose and justified use/verify/reject/disclose/escalate
1234
Disclosure — used accurate, specific disclosure language
1234
Willingness to stop or escalate — accepted this as a legitimate strong answer
1234
Quality of reasoning — explained the 'why', not just the choice
1234
Group discussion behaviour — engaged constructively with disagreement
1234
Notes
What confused students?
Which scenario generated the most useful discussion?
What wording should be revised? (log in the Pilot Revision Log)
Any safeguarding concern raised? (do not record content — see Safeguarding Protocol)
Any accessibility or device issue?
Educational resource. GUARD is a practical WhizzStep classroom method, not an externally certified or accredited standard. Not legal, safeguarding-policy or emergency-response advice.